Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

5

Views

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of the operative and postoperative effects of del Nido and blood cardioplegia solutions in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

Yavuz OrakI; Aydemir KocarslanII; Omer Faruk BoranI; Mehmet AcipayamII; Erdinc ErogluII; Mehmet KirisciII; Adem DoganerIII

DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0436

ABSTRACT

Objective: Our goal was to compare the operative and postoperative effects of del Nido cardioplegia (DN group) and blood cardioplegia (BC group) performed in cardiac surgery.
Methods: A total of 83 patients were included, separated into DN group and BC group. The operative and postoperative effects of the two groups were compared for the first 24 hours until extubation. The operative and postoperative complete blood count (CBC), biochemical values and clinical parameters were compared.
Results: The first control activated clotting time (ACT) levels in DN group patients were lower (P=0.003) during the operation. The amount of cardioplegia in DN group were lower than that in BC group (P=0.001). The pump outflow and postoperative lactate level of DN group were lower than those of BC group (P=0.005, P=0.018, respectively), as well as the amounts of NaHCO3 (P=0.006) and KCl (P=0.001) used during the operation. The same occurred with the first monocytes (Mo) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) levels in the postoperative intensive care unit (P=0.006, P=0.002). However, the first glucose level and the eosinophil (Eo) level were higher in DN group (P=0.011, P=0.047, respectively).
Conclusion: In the operative evaluation, the amount of cardioplegia, the first ACT levels, the pump outflow lactate level and the amounts of NaHCO3 and KCl in DN group were lower. In postoperative evaluation, measured level of lactate, Mo and MCV in DN group were all lower; their glucose and Eo levels were higher.

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ACT = Activated clotting time

BC = Blood cardioplegia

BMI = Body mass index

CABG = Coronary artery bypass grafting

CBC = Complete blood count

CPB = Cardiopulmonary bypass

DM = Diabetes mellitus

DN = del Nido cardioplegia

Activated clotting time

Eo = Eosinophils

FiO2 = Fraction of inspired oxygen

HIMS = Hospital information management system

ICU = Intensive care unit

KCl = Potassium chloride

LVEF = Left ventricular ejection fraction

MAC = Minimum alveolar concentration

MCV = Mean corpuscular volume

Mo = Monocytes

MgSO4 = Magnesium sulphate

NaHCO3 = Sodium bicarbonate

SPSS = Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

INTRODUCTION

In cardiac surgery, the myocardial injury sustained during the operation is the most important cause of mortality and morbidity. The application of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and elective cardiac arrest provided surgeons with the ability to operate in a blood-free environment and the precious time necessary for meticulous work. Ensuring adequate myocardial protection during the surgery, as well as before and after the operation, is the most significant factor of success[1,2]. Cardioplegia, as well as local and systemic hypothermia, have been used in cardiac surgery for many years for myocardial protection[3,4]. The causes of myocardial damage are global myocardial ischemia (aortic cross-clamp) and especially reperfusion[5]. Reperfusion following the ischemic period, although a definite need to maintain the viability of ischemic tissue, can itself cause serious or even potentially lethal damage to tissue that otherwise could have survived[6]. Cardioplegia, which is an elective and chemical cardiac arrest technique, was first applied as potassium cardioplegia in 1955 in cardiovascular surgery by Melrose[7]. Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA) developed a new formulation for myocardial protection in the early 1990s. This team, led by Pedro del Nido, Hung Cao-Danh, K. Eric Sommers, and Akihiko Ohkado, patented this solution as a result[8]. Changes have been made to the original solution and, in the literature, its use in clinical practice is referred to as del Nido cardioplegia[9].

Our goal in this study was to compare the effects of del Nido cardioplegia with those of blood cardioplegia, both during the operation and in the first 24 postoperative hours until extubation, in patients undergoing CPB with the mechanical ventilator turned off throughout the pumping period.

METHODS

Approval for this study was granted (#2018/12-06) on July 13, 2018, by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University. All patients included in the study had on-pump CPB between May 1, 2017, and August 15, 2018. Patient files and hospital information management system (HIMS) records were retrospectively reviewed and, of 150 cases operated on between these dates, 83 were included in the study.

Patients were divided into two groups: those who received del Nido cardioplegia (DN group, n=43) and those who received blood cardioplegia (BC group, n=40). Components of the solution used in el Nido and blood cardioplegia was shown in Table 1. All patients included in the study underwent non-emergency CPB with the mechanical ventilator turned off while on the pump, were extubated in the first 24 postoperative hours, and no patient suffered complications during the same 24-hour period. Exclusion criteria were emergency patients; patients who either were never on the pump or whose mechanical ventilators were on during CPB; patients who were extubated more than 24 hours after surgery; and patients with bleeding diathesis, renal failure, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), and electrolyte imbalance. Recorded information for each patient included their age; sex; body mass index (BMI); comorbid diseases; smoking/non-smoking status; CPB time; cross-clamping time; first measured activated clotting time (ACT) level; first amount of heparin administered and corresponding ACT level at the beginning of CPB; amount of protamine and corresponding ACT level; type and amount (mL) of cardioplegia used; lactate and glucose level at the beginning and at the end of CPB; length of surgery; and amounts of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, 84 mg/mL, ampoule), potassium chloride (KCL, 7.5%, ampoule), magnesium sulphate (MgSO4, 15%, ampoule), Calcium Picken (calcium gluconate 10%), furosemide (20 mg/2 ml, ampoule), and 20% mannitol (100 ml) used during CPB. Complete blood count (CBC) and biochemical and albumin levels, the amount of urine produced prior to extubation and time of extubation were all recorded in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first 24 hours after surgery. The use of operative and postoperative inotropic agents and the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation in the ICU were investigated.

Table 1 - Components of the solution used in del Nido and blood cardioplegia.
Variables Del Nido cardioplegia Blood cardioplegia
Components    
NaCl (mEq) 0 77
KCl (mEq) 26 20
NaHCO3 (mEq) 13 10
20% mannitol (mL) 17 20
15% MgSO4 (mL) 14 10
2% lidocaine (mL) 6.5 0
Cardioplegia: blood ratio 4:01  

Acetate=27 mEq; Cl=98 mEq; gluconate=23 mEq; K=5 mEq; Mg=3 mEq; Na=141 mEq; pH=7.40; phosphate=1 mEq

Table 1 - Components of the solution used in del Nido and blood cardioplegia.

Surgery was performed by two separate surgical teams at the cardiovascular surgery clinic. In all cases, antegrade cardioplegia was used and CPB with mild systemic hypothermia (30 to 34°C). Anesthesia was induced with 0.01 mg/kg of midazolam, 5 to 10 µg/kg of fentanyl, and 0.1 mg/kg of pancuronium. Pancuronium was administered continuously every half hour. Left radial artery cannulation was performed, followed by central venous catheterization. Sevoflurane 1-2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was used in the operation. The mechanical ventilator settings were: FiO2 0.5 or 50%, tidal volume 7 to 10 mL/kg, respiratory rate 12, inspiration/expiration rate 1/2, flow of 2 L/min.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test, while the independent samples t-test was used to examine the differences between the BC and DN cardioplegia groups. Statistical parameters were expressed as mean±SEM. We examined the distribution of categorical variables according to groups using the chi-square test. In categorical variables, the statistical parameters were expressed as percentages (%) and frequencies (n). Statistical significance was accepted as P<0.05. Data were evaluated with IBM SPSS 22 software.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients in DN group was 54.95 years and those in BC group was 59.83 years. There were 22 male patients (51.16%) in DN group and 23 (57.50%) in BC group (Table 2).

Table 2 - Sociodemographic characteristics.
    Groups P-value
Blood cardioplegia
(n=40)
Del Nido cardioplegia
(n=43)
Age   Mean±SEM 59.83±2.49 54.95±2.57 0.178
BMI (kg/m2)   Mean±SEM 27.06±0.72 28.47±1.06 0.281
EF   Mean±SEM 56.5±2.1 55.3±2.4 0.704
Sex Male n (%) 23.00 (57.50) 22.00 (51.16) 0.553
Female n (%) 17.00 (42.50) 21.00 (48.84)  
Smoking Smoker n (%) 7.00 (17.50) 6.00 (14.29) 0.690
Non-smoker n (%) 33.00 (82.50) 36.00 (85.71)  
Number of years smoking   Mean±SEM 15.20±1.35 13.10±1.82 0.362

Chi-square test; Fisher's exact test; α=0.05; independent samples t-test.

BMI=body mass index; EF=ejection fraction

Table 2 - Sociodemographic characteristics.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients comprised 41.8% of the DN group members and 57.5% of the BC group. Among the comorbidities observed in patients, hypertension was quite high (Table 3).

Table 3 - Distribution of diseases and comorbidities.
  Groups P-value
Blood cardioplegia Del Nido cardioplegia
n=40 % n=43 %
Disorders CABG 23 57.5 17 41.8 0.567
AVR+MVR 3 7.5 4 9.3
AVR+CABG 1 2.5 3 7.0
AVR 3 7.5 2 4.7
VSD 1 2.5 2 4.7
MVR 4 10.0 4 9.3
ASD 5 12.5 4 9.3
MVR+CABG 0 0.0 2 4.7
Aortic aneurysm 0 0.0 2 4.7
TVR 0 0.0 1 2.3
MVR+TVR 0 0.0 1 2.3
Additional diseases Inguinal hernia 1 2.5 0 0.0  
HT 18 45.0 19 44.2
DM 11 27.5 16 37.2
COPD 5 12.5 9 20.9
Hypothyroidism 3 7.5 4 9.3
CVD 3 7.5 5 11.6
Hyperthyroidism 0 0.0 2 4.7
Rheumatoid arthritis 0 0.0 1 2.3

Fisher's exact test; α=0.05.

ASD=atrial septal defect; AVR=aortic valve replacement; CABG=coronary artery bypass grafting; COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD=cerebrovascular disease; DM=diabetes mellitus; HT=hypertension; MVR=mitral valve replacement; TVR=tricuspid valve replacement; VSD=ventricle septal defect

Table 3 - Distribution of diseases and comorbidities.

During the operation, the first ACT levels were lower in DN group patients than in BC group patients. The difference between them was statistically significant (P=0.003). The amounts of cardioplegia used were 955.81±32.78 mL in DN group and 1667.74±84.03 mL in BC group, and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). The pump outflow lactate level of the DN group was also lower by a statistically significant amount (P=0.005). The amount of NaHCO3 and KCl used during the surgeries were also lower for DN group patients, with statistically significant differences (P=0.006 and P=0.001, respectively) (Table 4). In the postoperative ICU, the first lactate level was lower in DN group by a statistically significant level (P=0.018). From the postoperative CBC tests, the first monocytes (Mo) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) levels in the DN group were both low when compared to those in the BC group. The differences were statistically significant (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively). In the postoperative ICU, the first measured glucose level and eosinophil (Eo, %) level were higher in DN group, and this was statistically significant (P=0.011 and P=0.047, respectively) (Table 5). The number of patients who received noradrenaline during operation was higher in the DN group (P=0.013). There was no difference between the groups in terms of postoperative atrial fibrillation development (P=0.692) (Table 6).

Table 4 - Distribution of operating parameters by type of cardioplegia.
  Groups P-value
Blood cardioplegia
Mean±SEM
Del Nido cardioplegia
Mean±SEM
CPB time (min) 112.43±6.40 114.58±6.30 0.811
Aortic cross-clamping time (min) 70.73±6.17 77.93±6.12 0.410
First measured ACT 122.85±3.73 106.79±3.64 0.003*
Heparin used at inflow (IU) 29712.50±1085.14 31511.63±1085.3 0.245
Inflow active coagulation time 588.10±29.98 671.74±33.56 0.068
Outflow active coagulation time 131.26±2.26 126.65±2.22 0.152
Prothrombin used at outflow (IU) 29565.79±1115.67 32418.60±1098.7 0.073
Amount of cardioplegia used (mL) 1667.74±84.03 955.81±32.78 0.001*
Inflow lactate (mmol/L) 1.4200±0.15 1.1405±0.08 0.110
Outflow lactate (mmol/L) 3.0136±0.21 2.3049±0.13 0.005*
Inflow glucose (mg/dL) 132.03±7.08 136.33±7.38 0.676
Outflow glucose (mg/dL) 198.61±6.40 202.21±5.76 0.676
Pump NaHCO3 (ampoule) 9.95±0.46 8.40±0.31 0.006*
Pump KCl (ampoule) 5.13±0.20 3.88±0.11 0.001*
Pump MgSO4 (ampoule) 3.05±0.13 3.12±0.11 0.712
Pump mannitol (ampoule) 106.25±5.714 104.65±3.24 0.805
Pump furosemide (ampoule) 1.25±0.06 1.14±0.05 0.207
Surgery time (min) 238.15±10.85 237.33±9.38 0.954

Independent samples t-test; α=0.05;

* Difference is statistically significant.

ACT=activated clotting time; CPB=cardiopulmonary bypass

Table 4 - Distribution of operating parameters by type of cardioplegia.
Table 5 - Distribution of the first biochemical and clinical parameters in the first 24 postoperative hours, by type of cardioplegia.
  Groups P-value
Blood cardioplegia
Mean±SEM
Del Nido cardioplegia
Mean±SEM
Glucose (mg/dL) 172.97±8.86 203.79±7.67 0.011*
Lactate (mmol/L) 3.22±0.38 2.31±0.16 0.018*
Extubation time 404.25±31.33 447.98±32.38 0.335
Urine produced until extubation 1244.32±103.52 1395.71±82.04 0.250
Albumin (mg/dL) 3.24±0.08 3.37±0.07 0.262
pH 7.40±0.01 7.42±0.01 0.338
PO2 107.06±6.77 93.97±5.65 0.139
PCO2 35.14±0.91 35.81±0.86 0.596
Hg (g/dL) 10.88±0.22 10.42±0.19 0.111
Htc (%) 33.56±0.69 32.11±0.55 0.101
HCO3 22.69±0.30 23.16±0.41 0.371
K (mmol/L) 3.97±0.12 4.05±0.09 0.544
Na (mmol/L) 137.18±4.08 138.02±0.63 0.822
Ca (mg/dL) 1.27±0.20 1.06±0.03 0.270
WBC (10^9/L) 14.80±0.81 13.04±0.58 0.076
Ne (10^9/L) 12.60±0.75 11.13±0.52 0.105
Ne (%) 84.78±0.79 85.03±0.65 0.803
Ly (10^9/L) 0.90±0.08 0.92±0.09 0.833
Ly (%) 6.48±0.59 7.23±0.66 0.401
Mo (10^9/L) 1.28±0.10 0.95±0.06 0.006*
Mo (%) 8.63±0.54 7.38±0.41 0.067
RBC (10^6 U/L) 3.53±0.06 3.69±0.05 0.058
MCV (fL) 86.08±0.68 82.51±0.85 0.002*
MCH (pg) 30.11±1.60 27.47±0.36 0.095
RDW (fL) 44.46±0.68 43.66±0.62 0.388
Plt (10^9/L) 184531.25±11783.26 165875.00±7301.23 0.173
BUN (mg/dL) 32.44±2.92 26.23±.68 0.121
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.31±0.14 1.24±0.14 0.731
AST (U/L) 78.13±10.07 69.89±6.39 0.484
ALT (U/L) 33.53±5.12 30.46±2.84 0.593
Magnesium (mg/dL) 2.39±0.08 2.36±0.09 0.763
Ba (10^9/L) .01±0.00 0.06±0.05 0.347
Ba (%) .06±0.01 0.06±0.01 0.910
Eo (10^9/L) .01±0.00 0.03±0.01 0.064
Eo (%) .07±0.03 0.29±0.10 0.047*
RDW (%) 14.66±0.23 15.11±0.31 0.253

Independent samples t-test; α=0.05;

* Difference is statistically significant.

ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; Ba=basophils; BUN=blood urea nitrogen; Ca=calcium; Eo=eosinophils; HCO3=bicarbonate; Hg=hemoglobin; Htc=hematocrit; K=potassium; Ly=lymphocytes; MCH=mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV=mean corpuscular volume; Mo=monocytes; Na=sodium; Ne=neutrophils; PCO2=partial pressure of carbon dioxide; Plt=platelets; PO2=partial pressure of oxygen; RBC=red blood cells; RDW=red blood cell distribution width; WBC=white blood cells

Table 5 - Distribution of the first biochemical and clinical parameters in the first 24 postoperative hours, by type of cardioplegia.
Table 6 - Use of inotropic agent and development of postoperative atrial fibrillation by groups.
  Groups P-value
Blood cardioplegia  Del Nido cardioplegia 
(n=40) % (n=43) %
Operative dopamine Yes 36 90.0 41 95.3 0.347
No 4 10.0 2 4.7
Operative dobutamine Yes 5 12.5 2 4.7 0.199
No 35 87.5 41 95.3
Operative noradrenaline Yes 29 72.5 40 93.0 0.013*
No 11 27.5 3 7.0
Operative adrenaline Yes 1 2.5 1 2.3 0.959
No 39 97.5 42 97.7
Postoperative dopamine Yes 25 62.5 28 65.2 0.693
No 15 37.5 15 34.8
Postoperative noradrenaline Yes 9 22.5 10 23.3 0.935
No 31 77.5 33 76.7
Postoperative adrenaline Yes 1 2.5 0 0.0 -
No 39 97.5 43 100.0
Postoperative dobutamine Yes 0 0.0 0 0.0 -
No 40 100.0 43 100.0
Postoperative atrial fibrillation Yes 7 17.5 9 20.9 0.692
No 33 82.5 34 79.1  

Chi-square test; Fisher's exact test; a=0.05.

* Difference is statistically significant.

Table 6 - Use of inotropic agent and development of postoperative atrial fibrillation by groups.

DISCUSSION

In the operative evaluation of our study, the amount of cardioplegia (mL), the first measured ACT values, the outflow lactate level, the amounts of NaHCO3 used, and the amounts of KCl in DN group were all lower. In the postoperative ICU evaluation, first lactate level, Mo, and MCV levels in DN group were all lower and the first glucose levels and Eo were higher than those of BC group.

In studies similar to ours, a smaller amount of cardioplegia (mL) were used in DN group[10,11]. In another study, comparing the use of del Nido with that of St. Thomas’ cardioplegic solution, it was shown that del Nido cardioplegia resulted in shorter cross-clamp and CPB times, less cardioplegia used, and better myocardial protection in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)[12]. The CPB times in our study were shorter for BC group than for DN group, but this difference was not statistically significant. In a separate study, cardiac ischemia and total CPB times were shorter in DN group than in BC group. This difference is probably attributable to the normothermic strategy used in the DN group and the feasibility of the single-dose infusion[13]. Del Nido cardioplegia has been shown to be safe in the reoperative aortic valve[11] and post-infarction CABG surgeries[14]. It has also been reported not only to reduce operative time but also to result in myocardial protection and cost-effectiveness in isolated valve surgeries[15]. In the postoperative ICU evaluation of our study, glucose levels in DN group were higher than those of BC group. A different study reported that the myocardial protection and clinical results provided by del Nido cardioplegia in adult isolated CABG patients is equal to that provided by blood cardioplegia, while the CPB glucose levels of del Nido are lower than those of blood cardioplegia[16]. There was no difference in the operative blood glucose level in our study.

Del Nido solution is safe for use in adult primary isolated aortic and mitral valve operations. Some surgical approaches have the advantage of reducing surgical time, cost, postoperative insulin need, surgical downtime, and also give a more positive outcome with regard to blood glucose levels[16]. Myocardial injury measurements, such as troponin T levels, postoperative LVEF, and postoperative inotropic/vasopressor support, were similar to those in patients who received Buckberg solution. The crystalloid component of the del Nido solution is not glucose-based (unlike the Buckberg solution); patients who received the del Nido solution had lower blood sugar levels and needed less insulin in the postoperative period[15]. In our study, the number of patients using noradrenaline during the operation was higher in the DN group. But there was no difference between groups in terms of postoperative inotropic use. In addition, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Del Nido cardioplegia has been shown to be associated with reduced spontaneous activity and myocardial injury, and with better functional recovery during arrest in isolated older hearts, when compared to blood cardioplegia[17]. In one study, del Nido cardioplegia solution had the potential to provide superior myocardial protection in elderly hearts by preventing electromechanical activity during cardioplegic arrest and Ca2+-induced hypercontraction during early reperfusion[18]. Studies have shown that the sustained release of lactate or higher lactate levels in the reperfusion period after CABG is not satisfactory for myocardial protection and the improvement of aerobic metabolism decreases perioperatively[19].

In our study, the pump outflow and postoperative lactate levels in DN group were lower than in BC group. The low operative and postoperative lactate levels in DN group, and its smaller amount of cardioplegia, were found to be advantageous in terms of myocardial protection and clinical follow-up. Since the amounts of NaHCO3 and KCL used were higher in DN group, the low amounts of NaHCO3 and KCL used throughout the operation were considered normal.

In the postoperative ICU evaluation, the lower the first measured Mo and MCV values, the higher the first glucose level, which can be seen as a disadvantage of del Nido cardioplegia. It is our belief that our study will constitute an example in the literature and lead to new studies. The limitations of our study are its retrospective nature and the diversity of cases.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the operative and postoperative effects in DN group and BC group were investigated. In the operative evaluation, the cardioplegic amount (mL) used and the pump outflow lactate level in DN group were lower. This was an advantage in terms of myocardial protection and clinical follow-up. In the postoperative evaluation in the ICU, the first measured level of lactate, Mo, and MCV in DN group were all lower, while the first glucose level was higher. The low postoperative lactate level was considered an advantage of del Nido cardioplegia, whereas the lower the Mo and MCV values, the high first glucose level, which was seen as a disadvantage. These results will bring different perspectives on the use of del Nido and blood cardioplegia and will pave the way for new studies.

REFERENCES


1. Özdöl Ç, Erol Ç. Kalp cerrahisinde miyokard koruması In: Paç M, Akçevin A, Aka SA, Büket S, Sarıoğlu T, Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi, I. Cilt 2. baskı Ankara: MN Medikal&Nobel 2013; 181-204.

2. Skubas N, Lichtman AD, Sharma A, Thomas SJ, Kalp cerrahisinde anestezi In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Calahan MK, Stock MC. Çeviri editor Günaydin B, Demirkan O, KlinikAnestezi 5. baski Istanbul: Nobel 2012; 886-932.

3. Roe BB, Hutchinson JC, Fishman NH, Ullyot DJ, Smith DL. Myocardial protection with cold, ischemic, potassium-induced cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;73(3):366-74.

4. Conti VR, Bertranou EG, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Digerness SB. Cold cardioplegia versus hypothermia for myocardial protection. Randomized clinical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;76(5):577-89. doi:10.1016/ S0022-5223(19)41005-2.

5. Buckberg GD. Strategies and logic of cardioplegic delivery to prevent, avoid, and reverse ischemic and reperfusion damage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;93(1):127-39. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)36485-2.

6. Hearse DJ. Ischemia, reperfusion, and the determinants of tissue injury. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990;4 Suppl 4:767-76. doi:10.1007/BF00051274.

7. Melrose DG, Dreyer B, Bentall HH, Baker JB. Elective cardiac arrest. Lancet. 1955;269(6879):21-2. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(55)93381-x.

8. Del Nido PJ, Cao-Danh H, Sommers KE, Ohkado A, inventors. University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, assignee. An aqueous heart preservation and cardioplegia solution. United States US 5,407,793. 199r Apr 18.

9. Matte GS, del Nido PJ. History and use of del Nido cardioplegia solution at Boston children's hospital. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44(3):98-103. Erratum in: J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45(4):262.

10. Ad N, Holmes SD, Massimiano PS, Rongione AJ, Fornaresio LM, Fitzgerald D. The use of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):1011-8. doi:10.1016/j. jtcvs.2017.09.146.

11. Sorabella RA, Akashi H, Yerebakan H, Najjar M, Mannan A, Williams MR, et al. Myocardial protection using del nido cardioplegia solution in adult reoperative aortic valve surgery. J Card Surg. 2014;29(4):445-9. doi:10.1111/jocs.12360.

12. Mishra P, Jadhav RB, Mohapatra CK, Khandekar J, Raut C, Ammannaya GK, et al. Comparison of del Nido cardioplegia and St. Thomas hospital solution - two types of cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. Kardiochir Torakochirur Pol. 2016;13(4):295-9. doi:10.5114/kitp.2016.64867.

13. Kim WK, Kim HR, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, et al. del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: beyond single-valve surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27(1):81-7. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivy028.

14. Yerebakan H, Sorabella RA, Najjar M, Castillero E, Mongero L, Beck J, et al. Del Nido Cardioplegia can be safely administered in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting surgery after acute myocardial infarction: a propensity matched comparison. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:141. doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0141-5.

15. Mick SL, Robich MP, Houghtaling PL, Gillinov AM, Soltesz EG, Johnston DR, et al. del Nido versus Buckberg cardioplegia in adult isolated valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(2):626-34; discussion 634-6. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.085.

16. Timek T, Willekes C, Hulme O, Himelhoch B, Nadeau D, Borgman A, et al. Propensity matched analysis of del Nido cardioplegia in adult coronary artery bypass grafting: initial experience with 100 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(6):2237-41. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.058.

17. Govindapillai A, Hua R, Rose R, Friesen CH, O'Blenes SB. Protecting the aged heart during cardiac surgery: use of del Nido cardioplegia provides superior functional recovery in isolated hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(4):940-8. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.032.

18. O'Blenes SB, Friesen CH, Ali A, Howlett S. Protecting the aged heart during cardiac surgery: the potential benefits of del Nido cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(3):762-70. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.004.

19. Kurt MI, Yurtseven N, Tuygun AK, Savaşkan D, Canik S. Myocardial protection: standard versus insulin cardioplegia and glucose-insulin-potassium solutions. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;18(4):264-270.

Authors' roles & responsibilities

YO Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

AK Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published

OFB Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published

MA Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published

EE Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published

MK Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published

AD Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published

Article receive on Thursday, January 24, 2019

Article accepted on Monday, January 6, 2020

CCBY All scientific articles published at www.rbccv.org.br are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Indexes

All rights reserved 2017 / © 2024 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY