Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

61

Views

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Improvement in cardioplegic perfusion technique in single aortic clamping - initial results

Marcelo Luiz Peixoto SobralI; Sérgio Francisco dos Santos JúniorII; Juliano Cavalcante de SáIII; Anderson da Silva TerrazasIV; Daniel Francisco de Mendonça TrompieriV; Thierry Araújo Nunes de SousaV; Gilmar Geraldo dos SantosVI; Noedir Antonio Groppo StolfVII

DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140026

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CVA: Cerebrovascular accident

AMI: Acute Myocardial Infarction

ACE: inhibitor Angiotensin Converting Enzyme

CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass

CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting

COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

ICU: Intensive Care Unit

LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a surgical procedure well standardized in the world today, with survival rates at one year around 97%, remaining at 81% even after ten years postoperatively[1]. The development of techniques of myocardial protection during aortic clamping is largely responsible for these good results.

Myocardial protection can be achieved with the use of methods of transient ischemia, myocardial or atrial infusion of cardioplegic solution into the coronary circulation. The choice of method to be used generally depends on the behavior of the service and experience of the surgeon[2].

In an adjuvant way, a current study reports that the technique of remote ischemic preconditioning reduced the amount of release of cardiac enzymes in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization, although no difference in length of hospital stay and creatinine values ??were reported. This technique has its efficacy independent of myocardial protection technique[3]. Hong et al.[4] conclude that the remote ischemic preconditioning with remote ischemic postconditioning of upper limb does not improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

However, performing multiple clamping of the ascending aorta during surgery with intermittent infusion may have the unintended effect of higher incidence of neurological events due to the manipulation of atheromatous plaques in this region. A single aortic clamping should be preferred in order to reduce these events[5].

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical outcome and the occurrence of neurological events in hospital stay of patients undergoing CABG with improved technique of intermittent perfusion of the aortic root with a single clamping.

 

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional observational study in which 50 patients with heart failure and indication of surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) underwent the procedure according to regular schedule and surgery by the same surgeon between August 2010 and June 2012.

Preoperative information (age, gender, diabetes mellitus II, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous stroke, previous MI, history of smoking and alcohol consumption, COPD, CRF, ARF, LVEF and current medications) were compiled and analyzed. Intraoperative (duration of each distal anastomosis, CPB flow during each reperfusion, MAP during infusion of the aortic root, time of each reperfusion and proximal anastomosis, number of distal and proximal anastomoses, CPB and anoxia, minimum temperature during CPB, using or not of the centrifugal pump during CPB or if the CPB disconnection was in sinus rhythm or ventricular fibrillation, as well as the HR, MAP, minimum and maximum temperature, diuresis, inotropic support and IABP) and postoperative in-hospital period (neurological deficit, duration of ICU and hospital stay, and perioperative as ECG changes, urea, creatinine, creatine kinase and troponin I).

We also obtained radiographic, echocardiographic, and cardiac catheterization data. Patients were recruited only after signing Written Informed Consent (IC), in accordance with Resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at Real e Benemérita Associação Portuguesa Beneficência de São Paulo under the protocol number 659-10.

Inclusion criteria

The study included patients of both genders with indication for CABG surgery performed with cardiopulmonary bypass, aged up to 70 years.

Exclusion criteria

The study excluded patients who had undergone surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass with moderate or severe aortic failure on echocardiography or aortography, with clinical evidence of previous cerebrovascular disease, clinical or ultrasound evidence of carotid system disease and concomitant surgery for aortic valve failure.

Surgical strategy

The approach to the heart was median longitudinal transsternal sternotomy , inverted "T" pericardiectomy, preparation for CPB, full heparinization (3mg/kg), arterial cannulation of the ascending aorta, cavoatrial cannulation and number 14 catheter insertion in the ascending aorta for connection of airway suction and infusion, entry into cardiopulmonary perfusion (conventional membrane oxygenation), clamping of the ascending aorta, making of the distal and proximal anastomoses, in this sequence, separated by a period of reperfusion of the aortic root performed by a catheter installed in the ascending aorta, the same used for aspiration of the aorta and left cavities being connected to the output side of the aortic perfusion cannula that supplied blood to reperfusion and additional via of the same side output provided flow through the newly anastomosed graft.

When the distal anastomoses were performed, the coronary with more severe lesion or those which may revascularize greater myocardial injury territory, provided that it was not the anterior descending coronary artery so that there was risk of excessive traction of the graft of the left internal thoracic artery (in the cases of other distal anastomoses in the left coronary).

Reperfusion blood of an average of three minutes was performed after each anastomosis. This method aims to provide distal blood flow to coronary obstruction through the newly anastomosed graft using cannula connection between the aorta and the graft itself.

Using standard monitoring equipment and surgical procedure, variables were assessed during surgery such as aspect of the ascending aorta for the presence of palpable plates calcium, ischemia time during performing the distal and proximal anastomoses, mean arterial pressure of aortic root and CPB flow during periods of reperfusion of the aortic root, time of each reperfusion, CPB time, anoxia and minimum temperature reached during surgery. After the allotted time the surgery was completed as usual.

Patients were monitored until discharge as the postoperative routine laboratory tests and evolution of clinical and hemodynamic parameters.

We propose a standard two basic positions, which begin after the clamping performed once proximally to the insertion of the arterial cannula in the ascending aorta. Position 1 for perfusion and reperfusion of the aortic root (Figure 1) where there is a direct connection between the arterial cannula and the intravascular space existing between the clamped region and the aortic valve apparatus that shall be competent, otherwise there would be excessive extravasation of blood into the left ventricular cavity, reducing the inflow of blood to the coronary ostia and distending the left ventricle.

 

In this position 1, the connections should still be positioned so that the pressure is measured in the aortic root in order to ensure there is no method bias so that, during CPB with clamping and stopped heart, at this site there is no increase in pressure-induced vasopressors administered by an anesthesiologist or perfusionist, which could determine misinterpretations. It should also pay attention to the proper flow offered at CPB, which in this case requires no preference between roller pump or centrifugal pump.

Position 2 is the one that should be used when the time of anoxia during anastomosis, both distal and proximal, at which point "B" is closed to the side via and open to the aspirator used when necessary (Figure 2).

 

A third situation is still illustrated (Figure 3), which is initially important, of a cardioplegic solution backup because if we need to use it, it is ready requiring only release the cardioplegia via and clamp and the route of the aspirator before "Y" bifurcation of the vias. In this situation the "B" point should be in the position of Figure 2.

 

The "C" point is fundamental to the technique because it must provide at least two routes, because during reperfusion, one or more of them should be connected to the newly anastomosed grafts, which will ensure muscle myocardial perfusion distally to the coronary lesion, since the antegrade flow by ostia may be limited by significant injuries. It is important to make sure that the "C" point is open during reperfusion.

Thus, the technique of myocardial protection is describes when using the single aortic clamping accessory which consists of cannulation of the aortic root with improved support for intermittent coronary perfusion system.

Statistical Analysis

The data of the continuous and parametric variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Patients' characteristics

Most of the patients had one or more co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), prior AMI (Acute Myocardial Infarction), among others (Table 1).

 

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients 37 were male and 13 were female with a mean age of 58.5 ± 19.7 years. LVEF was normal in 39 patients, good in six, and poor in five of them. Regarding the optimization of preoperative medical treatment there was great heterogeneity, where 36 patients were under use of aspirin (Salicilic Acid), 35 beta-blockers and statins 29. 31 were under use of ACE inhibitors (Inhibitor of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme) and only two were insulin dependent (Table 1).

In four patients plaques the ascending aorta were identified on palpation. All patients underwent a single aortic clamping during the entire procedure, having been required additional manipulation of the "clamp" for any reason. The average time for completion of each distal anastomosis was 9.20±1.15 minutes and during reperfusions of the aortic root the mean CPB flow was 3316.92±443.26 ml/min while the average MAP during reperfusions was 67.85±10.86 mmHg.

The time of each reperfusion averaged 3.56±0.62 minutes. To perform the proximal anastomoses were required on average 5.56±1.44 minutes. The number of distal anastomoses was on average 2.56±0.57 per patient and proximal 1.44±0.50, and the mean CPB and anoxia times of 51.66±12.21 and 31.28±8.65 minutes respectively. The minimum temperature during surgery was on average 33.90±0.65 (Table 2).

 

The electrocardiograms did not suffer changes different from those that may be present preoperatively and bleeding was within acceptable parameters (below 1ml/Kg/h in the early hours). There was no renal failure after CPB. The mean peak level of postoperative CK-MB was 51.64±27.10 UL in the second postoperative day and troponin I was 3.35±4.39 ng/ml on the fourth postoperative day (Table 3). Mild cognitive impairment was observed in one patient and hemodynamic monitoring revealed no changes during hospitalization, which was within the usual service standards (Table 4). No deaths were observed.

 

 

DISCUSSION

The risk factor most important for intraoperative low cardiac output postoperatively is prolonged time of myocardial ischemia facing the effectiveness of the method used for myocardial protection[6]. Many techniques for handling myocardium during CABG are used and there is little safe evidence that a method is superior to another or that the same method is suitable in all circumstances[7].

It is known that there may be a reduction of postoperative left ventricular function even without evidence of myocardial necrosis, in the case of myocardial protection is inappropriate. Conventionally, this situation is called "myocardial stunning", or that is, a stunned myocardium[8,9].

The arguments in favor of non-cardioplegic methods include greater simplicity and, in the case of intermittent aortic cross-clamping, the proven ability of the myocardium to withstand short periods of ischemia, interspersed with periods of physiological reperfusion, without necrosis or loss of function[10,11]. In our study we found that with single clamping, with average short time of each anastomosis, either distal 9.20±1.15 minutes or proximal 5.56 ± 1.44 minutes, and always interspersed with blood reperfusion of the aorta 3.56±0.62 minutes.

It was found that brief periods of myocardial ischemia with perfusion intervals did not cause progressive depletion of high energy phosphates. This fact has a protective effect of myocardial preconditioning and proves that the injury produced by repeated clamping is not cumulative, but rather, it seems to increase myocardial tolerance to subsequent periods of ischemia[12-14]. This induction of tolerance to ischemia has been termed ischemic preconditioning (IPC)[12]. These data are confirmed in our study by myocardial markers CK-MB and troponin I within normal limits, as well as the echocardiographic control postoperatively.

The incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in the on-pump CABG ranges from 1.5% to 5.2% in prospective studies and from 0.8% to 3.2% in retrospective[3] vascular studies. The present study found only one case of mild cognitive impairment. The single most common cause of postoperative stroke is embolization of atherothrombotic debris from the aortic arch. Furthermore, only 45% of stroke after CABG are identified on the first day after surgery, while 55% of them occur after the normal recovery from anesthesia and are attributed to atrial fibrillation (AF), low cardiac output or hypercoagulable states resulting from tissue injury[15].

Risk factors for intraoperative stroke are CPB time, manipulation of the ascending aorta and arrhythmias[4]. The proposal of the authors was to present method of intermittent infusion to minimize the risk of multiple aortic clamping, as in patients with presence of atheromatous plaques in the ascending aorta may be increased incidence of strokes. In our study, we did not observe any occurrence of adverse neurological event.

The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in CABG ranges from 2 to 15%[16], and this variation can be explained by the absence of a gold standard test in the specific situation of infarction after coronary revascularization. In addition, electrocardiographic changes and elevation of cardiac enzymes in the postoperative period, even in patients without myocardial ischemia may occur[17,18].

International criteria for the diagnosis of MI after cardiac surgery is a new Q wave and CK-MB level > 3 times the reference value, new bundle branch block and level of CK-MB > 3 times the reference value or level of serum CK-MB > 8 times the reference value even in the absence of new Q[19] wave. Several authors have reported different cutoff points and different levels of sensitivity and specificity for troponin values as diagnostic of perioperative AMI.

Using the same enzymatic method Martinez et al.[20] found a diagnostic cutoff for troponin I in values of > 12ng/ml 10hrs after removal of the aortic clamp; Bonnefoy et al.[21] values of> 10ng/ml; Alyanakian et al.[22] values of > 15ng/mL; Gensini et al.[23] > 9.2 ng/ml after 12hrs and Sadony et al.[24] > 11.6 ng/ml after 24 hours of removal of aortic clamp. In the present investigation we found agreement with the studies described above, regarding the markers of myocardial ischemia and electrocardiographic changes.

All patients in our study underwent surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Various data available in the literature indicate advantage of CABG technique without cardiopulmonary bypass in selected[25] cases, however, although controversial in some points the "ROOBY" study showed no difference between the results of neuropsychological outcomes between CABG with and without CPB[26].

Intermittent perfusion of the aortic root is performed by some services as a method of myocardial protection and, although not standardized, it has been demonstrated reproducible given the simplicity of the method that requires skill and dexterity to saving time during the primary surgical time and familiarity with connections alternating aortic perfusion, the graft and simultaneous measurement of pressure in the aortic root and ascending aortic aspiration during anoxia.

The intention to provide better nutrient supply to the myocardium during intermittent infusions by this method has the benefits known and defended by adherents to the classic "intermittent aortic cross-clamping" with the additional benefit of minimal manipulation of the aorta, whereas only one clamping and unclamping of the aorta occurs, the last at the end of the proximal anastomoses.

Ko at al.[27], in 15 years of follow-up, observed that the overall mortality rate of patients undergoing CABG fell from 2.5% to 1.8%. In our study, despite the low number of patients studied, there were no deaths.

 

CONCLUSION

Coronary artery bypass grafting with the technique of intermittent perfusion of the aortic root with a single clamping proved to be safe, enabling satisfactory clinical and neurological outcomes in the patients studied.

REFERENCES

1. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Validation and interdependence with patient-variables of the influence of procedural variables on early and late survival after CABG. K. U. Leuven Coronary Surgery Program. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12(1):1-19. [MedLine]

2. Bonchek LI, Burlingame MW, Vazales BE, Lundy EF, Gassman CJ. Applicability of noncardioplegic coronary bypass to high-risk patients. Selection of patients, technique, and clinical experience in 3000 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103(2):230-7. [MedLine]

3. D'Ascenzo F, Cavallero E, Moretti C, Omedè P, Sciuto F, Rahman IA, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning in coronary artery bypass surgery:A Meta-analysis. Heart. 2012;98(17):1267-71. [MedLine]

4. Hong DM, Lee EH, Kim HJ, Min JJ, Chin JH, Choi DK, et al. Does remote ischaemic preconditioning with postconditioning improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery? Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning with Postconditioning Outcome Trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(3):176-83. [MedLine]

5. Djaiani G, Ali M, Borger MA, Woo A, Carroll J, Feindel C, et al. Epiaortic scanning modifies planned intraoperative surgical management but not cerebral embolic load during coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(6):1611-8. [MedLine]

6. Francel TJ, Kouchoukos NT. Postoperative care. In: Kirklin/Barratt-Boyes cardiac surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.p.195-253.

7. Fontan F, Madonna F, Naftel DC, Kirklin JW, Blackstone EH, Digerness S. Modifying myocardial management in cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6(3):127-36.

8. Heyndricx GR, Millard RW, McRitchie RJ, Maroko PR, Vatner SF. Regional myocardial function and electrophysiological alterations after brief coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs. J Clin Invest. 1975;56(4):978-85. [MedLine]

9. Braunwald E, Kloner RA. The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1986;66(6):1146-9.

10. Van der Veen FH, van de Vusse GJ, Reneman RS. Myocardial blood flow and oxygen consumption after aortic cross-clamping. J Surg Res. 1989;47(4):319-24. [MedLine]

11. Fernandes PMP, Jatene FB, Gentil AF, Coelho FF, Kwasnicka K, Stolf NAG, et al. Influência do Pré-Condicionamento Isquêmico na Proteção Miocárdica em Revascularização do Miocárdio com Pinçamento Intermitente da Aorta. Análise de Íons e Gasometria. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001;77(4):311-7.

12. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74(5):1124-36. [MedLine]

13. Yellon DM, Alkhulaifi AM, Pugsley WB. Preconditioning the human myocardium. Lancet. 1993;342(8866):276-7. [MedLine]

14. Jenkins DP, Pugsley WB, Alkhulaifi AM, Kemp M, Hooper J, Yellon DM. Ischemic preconditioning reduces troponin T release in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart. 1997;77(4):314-8. [MedLine]

15. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization Eur Heart J. 2010;31(20):2501-55. [MedLine]

16. Sobral MLP, Santos GG, Santos LAS, Haddad VLS, Avelar Júnior SF, Stolf NAG. Estudo comparativo randomizado da evolução imediata dos pacientes com artéria radial anastomosada proximalmente na aorta ou como enxerto composto. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2006;21(1):35-41. View article

17. Adam DH, Filsoufi F, Antmann EM. Medical management of the patient undergoing cardiac surgery. In: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow R, Braunwald E, eds. Braunwald's heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004. p.1993-2019.

18. Leal JCF, Braile DM, Godoy MF, Purini Neto J, Paula Neto A, Ramin SL, et al. Avaliação imediata da troponina I cardíaca em pacientes submetidos à revascularização do miocárdio. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 1999;14(3):247-53. View article

19. Bojar RM. Cardiovascular management. In: Bojar RM. Manual of perioperative care in cardiac surgery. 4 ed. Malden: Blackwell Science; 2005. p.404-7.

20. de Castro Martínez J, Vázquez Rizaldos S, Velayos Amo C, Herranz Valera J, Almería Varela C, Iloro Mora MI.. Troponina I cardíaca en el infarto del miocárdio: perioperatorio trás cirurgía de revascularización coronária. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2002;55(3):245-50. [MedLine]

21. Bonnefoy E, Filley S, Guidollet J. Cardiac troponin I to diagnose perioperative myocardial infarction after bypass surgery. Eur Heart J. 1995;16 (Suppl): 325. [MedLine]

22. Alyanakian MA, Dehoux M, Chatel D, Seguret C, Desmonts JM, Durand G, et al. Cardiac troponin I in diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12(3):288-94. [MedLine]

23. Gensini GF, Fusi C, Conti AA, Calamai GC, Montesi GF, Galanti G, et al. Cardiac troponin I and Q wave perioperative myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:(12)1986-90. [MedLine]

24. Sadony V, Korber M, Albes G, Podtschaske V, Etgen T, Trösken T, et al. Cardiac troponin I plasma levels for diagnosis and quantitation of perioperative myocardial damage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;13(1):57-65. [MedLine]

25.Cantero MA, Almeida RMS, Galhardo R. Análise dos resultados imediatos da cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio com e sem circulação extracorpórea. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc.2012;27(1):38-44. [MedLine] View article

26. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1827-37. [MedLine]

27. Ko W, Tranbaugh R, Marmur JD, Supino PG, Borer JS. Myocardial Revascularization in New York State: Variations in the PCI-to-CABG Ratio and Their Implications. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(2): e001446. [MedLine]

No financial support.

Authors' roles & responsibilities

MLPS: Main Author

SFSJ: Help in bibliographical survey and review of the study

JCS: Help in tabulating the data and monitoring of patients

AST: Help in the data tabulation

DFMT: Help in the monitoring of patients in the perioperative period

TANS: Help in perioperative monitoring of patients

GGS: Article review

NAGS: Article review

Article receive on Sunday, July 7, 2013

CCBY All scientific articles published at www.rbccv.org.br are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Indexes

All rights reserved 2017 / © 2024 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY